Breakthrough Web Design - 515-897-1144 - Web sites for businesses
News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

Founded October 1, 2010


Heaviest 2013 defense budget cuts would fall on troops


This news story was published on February 14, 2012.
Advertise on NIT Subscribe to NIT

By Nancy A. Youssef, McClatchy Newspapers –

WASHINGTON — As the Pentagon sought to show Monday that it had made tough spending decisions in its fiscal 2013 budget proposal, the brunt of the reductions would fall on U.S. ground troops, which face job losses, modest pay raises and increased health care costs while serving in a smaller force.

Even with those cuts, however, the Pentagon’s base budget, which excludes most war spending, would decrease only slightly next year — from the current $531 billion to $525 billion — before rising to $534 billion in 2014.

The proposed budget shifts some long-term war costs into the base budget and includes greater spending on operations and maintenance, a driver of the growth. By the 2017 fiscal year, the base budget is projected to reach $567 billion.

The Pentagon has said it is responding to the economic downturn by saving $259.4 billion, but that reflects only cuts in the projected growth of spending through the 2017 fiscal year.

“Despite the president’s good intentions to improve the balance between military and non-military security spending, the budget leaves it essentially unchanged through 2016,” Miriam Pemberton, a research fellow at the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank, said in a statement.

The budget is intended to reflect the Obama administration’s new defense strategy, which calls for a leaner, more agile force that is prepared for any kind of threat, while focusing on Asia and the Middle East. The strategy, which officials introduced last month, said the military must be ready to conduct several operations at the same time.

Under the new budget plan, which Congress must approve, Pentagon officials said that some troops — although it didn’t specify how many — would be forced to leave the military as the department shrank the size of the services. By 2017, the Army is projected to shrink by 72,000 soldiers to 490,000, the Marines will shrink by 20,000 to 182,000, the Navy will shrink by 6,200 to 319,500 and the Air Force will shrink by 4,200 to 328,600.

Robert Hale, the Pentagon’s comptroller, said the military would be “humane” in its cuts, and that they’d still leave a larger force than before the wars started. In 2001, there were 480,000 soldiers and 180,000 Marines.

The Pentagon called for retiring some planes that transport troops, including 27 C-5As and 65 C-130s. It said it planned to reduce pay raises to below private-sector levels, with troops receiving 1.7 percent raises for the next two years, followed by 0.5 percent increases in 2015 and 1 percent hikes in 2016.

The budget also would delay the purchase of several weapons systems — notably 179 of the controversial F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, the most expensive weapons system in U.S. military history. Hale said the delay was to give the developer, Lockheed Martin, time to correct problems with the system, but critics have charged that delaying the purchases while not canceling them outright kicked the decision down the road and potentially raises the cost per system in the future.

Service members also will face increased health care fees, deductibles and co-payments phased in over several years, although the Pentagon didn’t offer specifics. Military-age retirees who make more than $45,179 annually — a pension usually reserved for officers — will see their health care costs nearly quadruple, from $600 annually in fiscal year 2013 to $2,048 in 2017.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 characters available

2 Responses to Heaviest 2013 defense budget cuts would fall on troops

  1. Avatar

    John Bunnell Reply Report comment

    February 14, 2012 at 5:04 pm

    Your right Ben, join the military because you think that it’s the thing to do, and maybe make it a career. Get trained in whatever MOS you decide. Then go to war for your country, possibly paying the ultimate sacrifice. Come home and find out that your facing military cuts, which can end your military career, plus lower pay raises and sky rocketing health care costs. Soldier, your expendable, unless we need you. The military is sounding more like big business. Sounds like something that I’d be interested in again. What will happen when nobody wants to inlist?

  2. Avatar

    Ben Richards Reply Report comment

    February 14, 2012 at 10:01 am

    Always the troops that take it on the chin.