Breakthrough Web Design - 515-897-1144 - Web sites for businesses
News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

Founded October 1, 2010


‘Machines’ may decide battelfield outcomes



This news story was published on May 31, 2013.
Advertise on NIT Subscribe to NIT

GENEVA, Switzerland, May 31 (UPI) — The military use of automated vehicles in deploying lethal force makes it easier to go to war and raises many legal questions, a U.N. official said from Geneva.

U.N. special envoy on summary executions Christof Heyns expressed concern about the use of autonomous vehicles on the battlefield. He expressed concerns that such vehicles would make it easier for nations to wage war.

“Beyond this, their deployment may be unacceptable because no adequate system of legal accountability can be devised for the actions of machines,” he said in a statement.

U.S. President Barack Obama said he’s reviewing policies on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles attacks on suspected terrorists.

Heyns said that while drones employ remote human operators, automated vehicles have no such human intervention.

Human Rights Watch said it was coordinating the global “Campaign to Stop Killer Robots.”

Director of the Arms Division at Human Rights Watch Steve Goose said that human interaction is needed in battlefield decisions. He the U.S. Defense Department in November said a person has to be in-the-loop in decisions involved the use of lethal force.

Heyns said that without some level of control, “machines and not humans will take the decision on who is alive or dies.”

Copyright 2013 United Press International, Inc. (UPI).

Need help with your website?
Call your local professional,
Breakthrough Web Design:
515-897-1144
or go to
BreakthoughWebDesign.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 characters available

One Response to ‘Machines’ may decide battelfield outcomes

  1. LVS Reply Report comment

    May 31, 2013 at 2:58 pm

    I don’t know about anyone else but I am not in favor of a machine deciding who should live and who should die. There should be a penalty for going to war and if there isn’t there is no reason not to. The tech country’s with money will always bee the winner. Not a good deal.