
MASON CITY – Iowa Civil Rights Director Beth Townsend denies information given to NorthIowaToday.com that Mayor Eric Bookmeyer is meddling in the process of the signing of a contract between the Mason City Human Rights Commission and the Iowa Civil Rights Commission.
A strong source informed NIT today that Bookmeyer has used Mason City attorneys to contact the Iowa Civil Rights Commission regarding the contract that Townsend presented to the Mason City Human Rights Commission last week. The source also indicated that Bookmeyer will insist that the Mason City Council and himself approve and sign any agreement between the two agencies.

The source indicated that Bookmeyer’s moves, if true, would be a violation of the Iowa Civil Rights Statute.
The source also said that “Bookmeyer continues to bully Human Rights.”
Acting on the information from the source, NorthIowaToday.com today asked Bookmeyer, Townsend, City Administrator Brent Trout, City Council members Alex Kuhn and Scott Tornquist, and Human Rights Department Director Lionel Foster to shed some light on the matter.
The contract Townsend presented to the Mason City Human Rights Commission is not open for negotiation, Townsend said last week when she presented the agreement to the Mason City HRC. Further, the contract only stipulates that the MCHRC may send cases to Des Moines if chooses to, but is not bound to do so; the MCHRC may still operate as it always has, provided it has the funding to do so. See the video at the bottom of this story for much more on that meeting.
Director Townsend shared the following information:
—-
From Beth A. Townsend, Director, Iowa Civil Rights Commission:
There have been no “negotiations” between the ICRC and the Mason City Human Rights Commission, or the City of Mason City and its officials. I have offered the MCHRC the opportunity to enter into a workshare agreement that they can chose to sign or not, depending on how the Commission decides to handle their remaining cases. The Mason City city attorney contacted me this week with a couple of questions regarding the workshare agreement and asked that two minor changes be made to the agreement for clarification purposes, which I agreed to. However, neither of the two changes, changed the terms of the agreement in any way and the terms offered in the original agreement remained exactly the same. Indeed, the city attorney did not inquire about “negotiating” any of the terms of the agreement and did not ask for any changes other than two grammatical changes.
Just for clarification, there is nothing within the ICRA that would prevent the local agency and/or city government from “negotiating” the terms of a workshare agreement with the ICRC. As a general rule, no negotiations are conducted because of the need to provide uniformity throughout the state for all local agencies that chose to enter into the workshare agreements with the ICRC, but I do take suggestions from agencies regarding the structure of the agreements. To date, MCHRC has not entered into a workshare agreement this year, however with the vote to reduce the funding for the commission, I offered the MCHRC the opportunity to enter into an agreement for the remainder of this fiscal year in an effort to assist them through their unique circumstances. The workshare agreement does not require the agency to refer cases to the ICRC, it simply establishes the terms under which the local commission will be reimbursed by the ICRC should they elect to do so.
With regard to what parties will need to sign the agreement, I have advised both the City Attorney and the acting chair of the MSCHR, that this will depend on the Mason City ordinances. There is nothing within the ICRA which requires the signature of any particular body. Rather the agreement must be signed by the appropriate authority depending on the governing city ordinance establishing the human rights commission. Some city ordinances within the state require City Council/Mayoral approval, others do not. I am not an expert in Mason City ordinances and have no opinion regarding the appropriate authority to sign the agreement. I would refer you to the Mason City city attorney for any questions regarding this issue.
I do not have a position on whether the MCHRC should enter into the agreement (although I can see no reason why they wouldn’t) or any of the issues currently facing the Commission and City of Mason City. I am here to answer questions posed by the citizens of Mason City, MCHRC commission members and members of city government, as I would for any other local community in the state of Iowa with similar issues or questions and to provide an option to the MCHRC for processing their remaining complaints. Should you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me as I know there is a lot of misinformation floating around and I would rather provide the correct answers to questions individuals may have.
——–
Response from Mayor Eric Bookmeyer:
I concur with Director Townsend.
To answer your questions more specifically from my perspective:
It has come to my attention that Mayor Bookmeyer has entered into the negotiating process with the Iowa Civil Rights Commission’s negotiations with the Mason City Human Rights Commission and the possible agreement that might be signed between the two agencies.
– I have not and have no intention to enter into any negotiating process regarding the agreement.
I am told Mr. Bookmeyer has used Mason City attorneys in this process and will insist that the Mason City Council and himself approve the agreement.
– After attending the April 3rd MCHRC meeting it became apparent that the work-share agreement being offered to the MCHRC had a signatory line for the mayor. As a courtesy to the MCHRC, I referred the work-share agreement to the city attorney for him to consider the agreement for recommendation to council and determine whether it needed council and mayoral approval. He has now signed off on the agreement and confirmed that it is a 28E agreement that would need council approval before mayoral signature, via Section 28E.4, pending MCHRC approval.
I am further told that the Mason City HR Commission is being left out of the process entirely.
– MCHRC was emailed the city attorney communications and the slightly amended agreement that the city attorney was willing to sign off on. That was done precisely so that MCHRC would have a work-share agreement in hand to consider at their May meeting that they had confidence that the city council would be counseled to approve by our city attorney.
——–
Response from Lionel Foster, Mason City Human Rights Director:
Thank you for (copying) me on this important subject. So that everyone’s has all of the history on ICRC work sharing agreements, the Mason City Commission has had such agreements with the ICRC for at least a decade, and until Beth arrived, there has never been a requirement for past Mayors or City Councils to lend their permission. In fact, the Commission has all the authority it needs under Chapter 216.19 to execute the agreement on its own behalf.
——–
Watch video from Mason City Human Rights Commission meeting on April 4th, 2013 when Director Townsend presented a contract to take cases from the Mason City Human Rights Commission if it chooses to refer them to Des Moines:
15 thoughts on “UPDATED 5 PM: Iowa Civil Rights Director denies Bookmeyer meddling in contract talks (VIDEO)”
Loosing the Mason City Human Rights Commission is a shameful thing. A Black Eye for Mason City.
When the good citizens of Mason City know the real truth they will not approve Mayor Bookmeyer closing down the Human Rights Commission by cutting it’s funding from the budget.
Bookmeyer and the City Council should hang their head in shame!!!
On the basis of a “strong source” NIT is trying to generate a story. Why would it be considered inappropriate for the mayor to be a part of an agreement between a city agency and the state?
This is normal & routine for all sorts of organizations, including the city. There is nothing “meddling” about it.
Quit with the sour grapes about a decision you disagree with. I bet a majority of voters agree with this council’s action.
@4ever49-What part of violation of Iowa Civil Rights Statue did you miss??
What source would you like? A weak source? How do you think reporters get news tips? The MCHRC is a quasi-judicial board. It’s not exactly the same as other boards. Coupled with the dubious relationship between Mayor Bookmeyer and the MCHRC and his ties to companies and individuals (even persons he has appointed to serve on this very commission) that have had battles with the MCHRC, all leads should be investigated for public consumption to root out any possible corruption. NIT will continue to report and follow up on everything sent our way.
Furthermore, I commend Ms. Townsend and Mayor Bookmeyer for their transparency in this matter.
I’d like a credible source.
So HRC is quasi-judicial – it still is beholding to its funding source, is it not? Therein is its commonality with other city boards.
As to “reporting & following up on everything sent our way”, how are we to know that the one reporting to you is not gaming the system by feeding designed “information” to you?
Gaming the system. That’s a new one. Perhaps you are a convicted murderer. Come clean with your real name if you want to throw stones.
I’m not throwing stones, just asking a legtimate question.
I’m asking a legitimate question as well. Are you a landlord? An employer? Do you have a history with the MCHRC? Do you have a criminal record? If you would like to infer that I or NIT is somehow not truthful or legitimate let’s take a peak into your past. What do you have to hide? Let’s explore your motivations for attacking the credibility of NIT. I will be waiting for you to reveal yourself so the playing field is leveled.
I don’t think he is attacking the credibility of NIT just asking for confirmation of the credibility of your source.Methinks thou doth protest too much.
Strong source or weak source without a name to back it up, it’s just gossip.
Well Matt-you got a answer from Townsend and I am sure she is telling you everything she knows to the best of her ability. She seems to be aware of the issues or at least someone’s version of them.I’m also pretty sure that Trout and Drunkmaster are very adept at hiding what they don’t want known. We will just have to see how this plays out. Thank you for keeping us informed.
At least they answered you. That’s something.
I agree. If the above information is out in the community, I would think it is in the best interests of all that the information be either corrected or confirmed. I think that City Hall would find this a useful way to build trust in the community, simply by answering questions and putting fears to rest.
The only reason we are going through this crap is because bookmeyer and tourquist got what they wanted!! Getting rid of the commission is not what was good for Mason City. You can say they didn’t get rid of it but it is not going to run as smooth as it did before but that is what they have wanted all along.