As chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Grassley previously led through Congress $2 trillion in bipartisan tax relief, leaving more money in workers’ pockets, reducing tax rates across the board and spurring economic growth and activity. Congress later made permanent the vast majority of the Grassley-led measures with significant bipartisan support.
Descriptions of Grassley’s successful amendments to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are below.
1) To unify the tax treatment of whistleblower awards.
Under current law, an above-the-line deduction is provided for certain legal fees in connection with certain whistleblower awards. IRC section 62(a)(20) provides for the deductibility of attorney fees and court costs incurred by a taxpayer in a claim under the False Claims Act (subchapter III of chapter 37 of Title 31 of the United States Code). Additionally, IRC section 62(a) (21) provides a comparable deduction for legal costs associated with awards provided under IRC Section 7623. This amendment would extend the same deduction provided for False Claims Act awards and IRS whistleblower program awards to awards paid under State False Claims Acts, the SEC whistleblower program (Sections 78u-6 and 78u-7 of title 15 of the United States Code), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission whistleblower program (Section 26 of title 7 of the United States Code).
2) To improve the IRS Whistleblower Program.
Under current law, IRC Section 7623 provides for awards to be paid to whistleblowers who provide information that leads to collection of taxes that may otherwise go unpaid. This amendment seeks to clarify the basis for such awards by providing a definition for “proceeds”. For purposes of IRC section 7623, proceeds would be defined to include: “(A) taxes, penalties, interest additions to tax, and additional amounts provided under the internal revenue laws, and (B) any proceeds arising from laws for which the Internal Revenue Service is authorized to administer, enforce, or investigate including (i) criminal fines an civil forfeitures, and, (ii) violations of reporting requirements.” Moreover, it would amend the disputed amount threshold in 7623(b)(5)(B) so that the $2 million threshold is based on the “proceeds” (as defined above) in dispute.
3) To increase the time period in which taxpayers may seek to have proceeds from the sale of wrongfully levied property returned to them.
The IRS is authorized to levy on property to satisfy a tax debt in certain instances. While the IRS is authorized to return property at any time, it is only authorized to return the monetary proceeds from a sale for up to nine months from the date of the levy. Similarly, if a third party believes the property levied or seized belongs to him/her and not the person against whom the tax is assessed, the third party generally only has nine months from the time of the levy to bring an administrative wrongful-levy action to seek the return of monetary proceeds. In many cases the nine month period is insufficient for individuals and third parties to discover a wrongful or mistaken levy and seek to remedy it. Consistent with section 202 of S. 1793, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights Enhancement Act of 2017, this amendment would extend from nine months to two years the time period that individuals and third parties have to seek the return of proceeds on the sale of wrongfully levied property.
4) Individuals held harmless on improper levy on retirement plans.
Under present law, if the IRS improperly levies on an IRA or an employer sponsored plan, the individual owning the retirement account may not be made whole, even if the IRS returns the amount levied, with interest, because the individual may lose the opportunity to have those funds accumulate on a tax-favored basis until retirement. Consistent with section 302 of s. 1793, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights Enhancement Act of 2017, this amendment (1) holds the taxpayer harmless by permitting an individual to recontribute wrongfully levied amounts to an IRA or employer sponsored plan without regard to contribution limits, (2) abates any tax that may have been applied with respect to the distribution made as a result of the wrongful levy if recontributed to the IRA or employer sponsored plan, (3) and expands the instances where the IRS must pay interest on amounts returned as a result of a wrongful levy.
5) Government Settlement Transparency Act.
This amendment, consistent with S. 803, Government Settlement Transparency Act, would expand provisions relating to the nondeductibility of fines and penalties to prohibit a tax deduction for any amount paid or incurred to, or at the direction of, any governmental entity relating to the violation of any law or the investigation or inquiry into a potential violation of law. The bill exempts from such prohibition: (1) restitution or amounts paid to come into compliance with any law that was violated or otherwise involved in the investigation or inquiry, (2) amounts paid pursuant to a court order in a suit in which the governmental entity was not a party, and (3) amounts paid or incurred as taxes due.
The only tax break the middle class will see will be in the $1000 range and that will last a couple of years as the cuts are phased out. Then, after a couple years the taxes come back and all the middle class will see their taxes go up and up. Upper bracketed tax payers have their tax break go on and on as well as corporations because the House wrote in those tax cuts are not temporary. They also forgot to tell you your state taxes will go up because they are cutting services to the states.
Bodie, I think what you need is a “Trumpy Bear”. You’re such an angry lib.
That’s good news! I can spend my tax return on clothing and other things. Oh wait…I don’t have health insurance so they will take away my refund. Bastards. And when this economic bubble bursts. Then what? Big corps can’t do away with secured pension fast enough and toss it into 401k’s. The market should be at a stable 16,000 now for Wall Street. What the hell is going on with health insurance anyways. Oh well, time for another bowl of spaghetti. lol
Hey, Charlie, how long will this “decrease” last? According to the bill, the decreases for middle incomers will gradually decrease to a $0 savings by 2020 and then move upward again. However, you did protect those corporations. Their cut will not be temporary; it is permanent.
Obamy/Hitlery/Kalifronicators – crazy liberals and dangerous to America.
If your considered middle class as far as income goes, you won’t see any tax advantages and will pay more for taxes. If you own the company, then you pay less taxes. In other words we get screwed! Gee thanks republicans. Won’t vote republican again
Can you read? If you can then read the article again. If you need help understanding it, ask a 3rd grader.
You can’t possible know who is getting a tax break yet. The bill isn’t even close to being final.
Grassley voted on a FINAL Senate bill; King voted on a FINAL House bill. Now they go to a committee. So to some extent, you are right. However, the elements that screw the retired, the middle income with no kids, and the phaseout of any savings for any middle class by 2020 while making the cuts on private jets, etc, permanent are in both bills. So, yes, to a large extent the bill(s) is/are final.
Liar!
You just can’t stand the truth can you? To hard for you liberals to understand.