MASON CITY – It’s all too familiar for some of us. Robin Anderson and city hall stooges holding “secret” meetings to do harm to a man’s business – and now they may have to pay up, big time.
G8 Development, a company once on the precipice of building a grand hotel in downtown Mason City but was inexplicably shooed away by the omniscient city council and their drones, is suing Mason City Chamber of Commerce Director Robin Anderson and the City of Mason City (as some citizens feared would happen) for reneging on the deal and now seeks damages.
The lawsuit states “Robin Anderson, in her capacity as Director of the Chamber, having “secret” meetings with certain members of the City Council and encouraging them to terminate the G8 Development Contract in favor of another proposal being offered by an entity known as Gatehouse Capital.”
HERE IS THE ENTIRE LAWSUIT AS PROVIDED TO NIT:
E-FILED 2017 JUL 18 3:39 PM CERRO GORDO – CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR CERRO GORDO COUNTY
G8 DEVELOPMENT, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF MASON CITY, IOWA and MASON CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION,
Defendants.
Case No. _______________ PETITION AT LAW
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, G8 Development, Inc., and for its causes of action and Petition at Law against the above-named Defendants, states the following:
THE PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
- The Plaintiff in this matter is G8 Development, Inc. (hereinafter “G8”).
- G8 is in the business of real estate development and is a California corporation licensed to do business in the State of Iowa, with a principal business addressed as 4538 Cass Street, San Diego, California 92109.
3. Upon information and belief, the City of Mason City, Iowa (hereinafter the “City”) is a municipal corporation organized under the provisions of the Constitution and the laws of the State of Iowa and is vested with the power to enter into contracts and carry out its obligations thereunder.
4. Upon information and belief, the official actions taken by the City, including entering into contracts, is subject to ratification and approval by a legally constituted City Council. 5. Upon information and belief, the Mason City Chamber of Commerce Foundation (hereinafter “the Chamber”) is an Iowa Nonprofit Corporation existing and established under Iowa Code Chapter 504, with a principal place of business located in Mason City, Cerro Gordo County, Iowa.
6. The actions and conduct giving rise to these causes of action took place in Mason City, Cerro Gordo County, Iowa and venue is, therefore, proper herein
7. The damages alleged herein exceed the jurisdictional minimum for an amount in controversy in this District Court.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
8. G8 and the City have been in continual negotiations for contracting to build a hotel since 2013.
9. The City submitted grant applications to the State of Iowa for funding assistance grants in the calendar year 2014.
- The State of Iowa turned down the City’s 2014 grant application.
- The 2014 failure to obtain grant funding from the State of Iowa slowed the negotiations between the City and G8.
12. Again, in 2015, the City submitted grant applications to the State of Iowa for funding assistance.
13. The State of Iowa granted the City’s 2015 grant application, and agreed to offer grants in the range of $7,000,000 to assist with urban renewal within the City.
14. On or about January 20, 2016, G8 and the City entered into a written “Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement” (hereinafter “Development Contract”). A true and complete copy of the Development Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
15. Approval of the City’s entry into the Development Contract with G8 was ratified by the City Council of Mason City in February of 2016.
16. Prior to the execution of the Development Contract, the City had undertaken efforts for urban renewal within the City in an area dubbed the “Mason City Downtown Reinvestment Urban Renewal Area” (referred to in the Development Contract and hereinafter as “Urban Renewal Area”).
17. Pursuant to the Development Contract, the City identified its ownership rights in certain real property located within the Urban Renewal Area (hereinafter referred to as the “Development Property”).
18. Pursuant to the Development Contract, the City identified its willingness to transfer ownership of the Development Property to G8, within timeframes and under terms as established in the Development Contract, in exchange for G8’s agreement to make certain improvements to the Development Property.
19. As a result of these transfer clauses contained in the Development Contract, G8 had an expectancy interest in the future based in the Development Contract.
20. In reliance on the Development Contract, G8 expended nearly $600,000.00 in reliance costs in connection with its performance of the Development Contract.
21. The Development Contract inured to the benefit of the City as a means of economic development and cured blight within the Urban Renewal Area.
22. The Development Contract referred to the anticipated improvements as “Minimum Improvements” and contemplated the construction of a business class hotel and what was referred to as a “Parking Facility.”
23. At all times pertinent hereto, G8 held exclusive contractual franchise rights to build a Marriott franchise hotel in Mason City in connection with the Development Contract.
COUNT I – BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST CITY
24. The aforementioned Development Contract between G8 and the City was valid and enforceable.
25. During the negotiation and pendency of the Development Contract, the City continually sought to impose upon G8 artificial and extra-contractual obligations that were not in good faith and that were not part of the Development Contract, including, but not necessarily limited to:
- altering the long-expected scope of the project to satisfy the requests the City had to meet to receive State of Iowa grant funding, including as related to a mixed-use requirement imposed by the State;
- requiring Requests for Proposals, that the City suggested to G8 were only perfunctory, and that would not affect G8’s rights under the eventual Development Contract;
- imposing arbitrary deadlines related to the submission of construction drawings;
- imposing arbitrary deadlines related to construction lending and loan commitments;
- arbitrarily delaying G8’s ability to meet its obligations under the DevelopmentContract by mis-platting the site whereby requiring G8’s architects and engineersto rearrange its site plan on the existing lot lines;
- requiring approval of new site plans by a City Architectural Review committee.
26. Each of these artificial and extra-contractual obligations imposed upon G8 by the City severely shortened the timelines set forth in the Development Contract and made complete performance by G8 impossible or impracticable.
27. Notwithstanding these arbitrary and extra-contractual obligations, G8, in reliance on the required good faith and fair dealing requirements that the law of the State of Iowa imposes on the City, spent significant sums of money in meeting its contractual requirements.
28. G8 likewise had significant expectation interests in the Development Contract, in that the ownership of the development in part reverted to G8 after the passage of time.
29. The City terminated the Development Contract with G8, arguing G8 was in default concerning the timelines in the Development Contract.
30. The termination was not in good faith, as it was the artificial and extra-contractual obligations the City imposed upon G8 that were responsible for the delays.
31. As a result of the bad faith termination of the Development Contract, G8 has been damaged in the form of the reliance damages it incurred in beginning its performance and the future expectation interests it would have received had the Development Contract not been wrongly terminated by the City.
COUNT II – QUANTUM MERUIT – IMPLIED IN FACT CONTRACT AGAINST CITY
32. As G8 began its performance of the Development Contract, G8 was performing services that the City was aware were inuring to the benefit of the City under the Development Contract.
33. The City had no expectation, and no right to expect, that G8 was performing these services gratuitously.
34. While the Development Contract did not specify that the reliance costs G8 was expending in preparation for performance would be separately reimbursed outside of the Development Contract, the City knew, or should have known, that its bad faith termination of the Development Contract would damage G8.
35. The reliance costs expended by G8 were of a benefit to the City, as part of its efforts at urban renewal within the City.
36. The requirements of good faith and fair dealing accompanying the Development Contract require that G8 be reimbursed for its reliance costs.
37. G8 has been damaged as a result of the monies spent on reliance costs.
COUNT III – INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT AGAINST CHAMBER
38. The stated mission of the Chamber is, in part, to “work for the success of its members.”
39. G8 has been damaged as a result of the monies spent on reliance costs.
40. An individual named Robin Anderson is the current Director of the Chamber and position at all times material hereto.
41. Anderson and the Chamber were aware that G8 and the City had a valid contract in the form of the aforementioned Development Contract.
42. Upon information and belief, the Chamber intentionally and improperly interfered with the Development Contract by, among other things, Robin Anderson, in her capacity as Director of the Chamber, having “secret” meetings with certain members of the City Council and encouraging them to terminate the G8 Development Contract in favor of another proposal being offered by an entity known as Gatehouse Capital.
43. The interference caused the City to terminate the Development Contract and affected G8’s ability to perform and complete its obligations under the contract.
44. As a result of this intentional interference by the Chamber, G8 was damaged as its Development Contract was wrongly terminated and it suffered reliance damages and loss of expectancy interests.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays that the Court enter Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and against all of the Defendants, jointly and severally, and further that an award of damages be made in favor of the Plaintiff, including attorney fees allowed under the Development Agreement, along with other and further relief as deemed appropriate.
WHITFIELD & EDDY, P.L.C. 699 Walnut St., Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA 50309 Telephone: (515) 288-6041 Fax: (515) 246-1474
Email: Doohen@whitfieldlaw.com
By /s/ Stephen E. Doohen Stephen E. Doohen
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, G8 DEVELOPMENT, INC.
In reply to ‘MCHS ’80’: Thx for your supportive comments. Feel free to hit me up on FaceBook and ID yourself! I recall precisely what happened all those years ago, at Roosevelt, and you’re right. Four or five 6th graders jumped me (I was in 4th grade) and stomped me mercilessly. Our principal, Mr. Tidball, basically gave them a slap on the wrist. That didn’t effectuate the attitude change they needed.
That’s why I upgraded their punishment from a slap on the wrist to steelies in the nuts. You remembered it right: those bullies left me alone after that. Every damn one. The two-day suspension you recalled I received was well worth it. No regrets whatsoever. Bullies must learn that actions have consequences – even painful ones.
Read most of what was offered here, this is my conclusion. “After all is said and done, more will be said than done.”
Went to Roosevelt with Todd and MCHS, and the wife. I can say, he is one of the nicest people,honest and more up front then anybody we know. He can be to straight up for his own good tho. Get on his bad side or lie to him or steal, it won’t go good not healthy. He got bullied back in the day, on count of his mouth. So Todd, he brings in a sling shot in his lunch box. Out on the Roosevelt playground he fires steely’s at the ones beat him up. One kid had to go to Mercy. Blodgett got kicked out for a couple days he didnt give a shit. Nobody messed with him after, he made his point. We heard about him running off some drug dealers. So we ask him, this was at the Kozy. He tells us all about it. We need people like Todd its good for Mason he does what he does. He is right on this Choder, we think.
@ 80, your saying Toddy boy has got a anger management issue and it does go way back. Oh great, we have us a spoiled Republitard here that does use force to hate on anybody he does not want around.
Shame on MCPD and our Republitard sherriff, they wont go after him, being violent is not how to do this. Maybe the big mouth orange joke in the White House will do like Ray-gun did, get Mr. Blodgett out of Mason so he can help him ruin the country like Ray-gun did.
So what, if Toddy boy is nice honest ect. He is trigger happy, has got big anger issues ect. Somebody could get killed one of these days.
In reply to ‘Obama forever’: Your ranting borders on the hysterical. I’ve never killed anyone, or had anyone killed. Hopefully, that won’t ever need to happen. Please cease with such baseless speculation, which borders on the accusatory.
Relocation efforts in which I’ve played a role benefited law-abiding north Iowans. Criminals, particularly drug dealers and creeps who beat up women and openly sell drugs, cause great harm to innocent victims – including children of recovering addicts who need no such temptations. I believe in public service, and my definition of it isn’t restricted to holding office, or wearing a uniform that comes with a badge. Drug pushers sometimes need to be … pushed out.
Hey you people hates on Todd your so wrong you don’t even know. He does alot of good, when he makes pushers to leave out of Mason, we know this. Would you like it if your kids sees drugs sold smoked bought used in your neck of the woods. No you would not now way.
aybe all you rich ones, the cops will get dealers out of where you live, they listen to you. Ok well they did not never, once get any out lived by us. And them thats pushing meth crack and what not, they would not of ever gone away if it would of not been for Todd. You people, you do not need nobody will do for you like Todd done for us, hey you walk a mile in our shoes, you will see what this is.
There’s no room for vigilantism. If todd keeps it up he will eventually meet his demise. Sounds a lot like sensationalism of his and others tales.
‘Anonymous’, these inflated claims (sensationalism, i.e., tall tales re. people maybe getting killed, etc.) are inherently ridiculous. No one should even have to respond – but who wants to risk people actually believing such allegations? BTW, not all vigilantism is negative: think of Bernard Goetz. The late Roy Innis, a black man who headed the civil rights group CORE (the Congress of Racial Equality), said, “a government which cannot protect its citizens has no right denying them the means to protect themselves.” I agree with Mr. Innis.
Mr. Blodgett, a relative of mine was one of your teachers, Mrs. Henry. I am sure you remember her, from Roosevelt. She has been gone for many years. She liked you, and told us what these others here are saying. She said you were a nice, very honest little boy. But also that you had the worst temper of anyone she ever knew. You should try to put a lid on your anger.
You are not a policeman, Todd, and getting mad at somebody does not give you the right to take the law into your own hands. Please pay heed to this advice. Before it’s too late.
In reply to ‘AA’ – I always liked Mrs. Henry; great lady, and a superb teacher. I didn’t know – until I saw your post – that she took note of that issue concerning me. You were lucky to have her as a family member. May she rest in peace.
@ Anon, seen your message here to Mr Blodgett, why do you defend somebody you say you never agree with. He is a drug junkie has been in jail I do know, my BF was in lock up with him. I do not say Blodgett is a liar I do not think he is. Your right on that but just because he don’t lie it don’t mean he is some kind of angel like your saying. Did you know, he use to own a racists record company.
Are you a cop anon, you sound like one. A cop we know says the cop’s, they like Blodgett on count of he does their dirty work run’s people out of Mason. Well big whoopie on that, guess what he don’t do it legal. Ok so how come you build him up. You tell me anon.
Darcy: I am going to respond to what you asked Anon. I too do not agree with Todd Blodgett’s right wing politics and never did vote for Dr. Blodgett. I am a proud Democrat, oppose Trump 1,000%. But I have seen Todd lots of times at the food bank where I volunteer. He brings in recovering addicts and others who come in to get food. The daughter of one of our friends told us Mr. Blodgett helped her kick her crystal meth habit. I expect Anon looks past Todd’s politics and respects him for the decent human being that he is.
I was nearly in shock when I found out that the pleasant fellow who brings hungry people to Hawkeye Harvest was Todd Blodgett. Maybe you can look beyond his politics like it looks like Anon does.
In reply to HH Lady – That’s really nice of you. I don’t know who you are (I see different volunteers there at various times), but keep up the great work you’re doing! You folks are helping lots of truly needy north Iowans!
Darcy just because I do not agree with someone does not mean that I have to despise them.
Todd has admitted to his drug addiction in the past and fortunately he recovered from that. Todd Blodgett is not “a drug junkie”, he is a recovered addict and has been clean for a very long time.
Sadly many do not recover. Anyone that overcomes an addiction of any kind deserves credit for great fortitude.
I never said that he was an “angel’, none of us are Darcy and that includes both you and me.
We all have issues and things in our past that we deeply regret, I
know that I do.
How about you Darcy, any regrets? (continued)
(continued)Darcy, I have been around for awhile as I am 67 years old. I served in the US Marine Corps and spent a year in that hell hole of Vietnam in the Mekong Delta. I was pretty messed up for years after that. It took me a long time to overcome my demons and to this day I still have to work at not going back there.
What I am trying to say is that life is not always fair and sometimes we make stupid choices, but Darcy I want you to know that every day I ask myself “What can I do to be a better person?”
So Darcy I wish you well and I hope that everyday that you become a better person, you are worth it. Let go of your hatred and you will be amazed at how much better your life will be.
Buttttt Tod – are you saying that saving the tax payers millions of dollars is sleazy? – any comments on gatehouse backers being honest ?
It was ludicrous for Mason City to have agreed to pay $150,000 for that feasibility study, agreed. That will be a big factor in/reason for, the issue’s looming defeat at the polls in November. I also detest GateHouse.
Just like it was ludicrous for the citizens to turn down several lucrative business opportunities a year ago because they let a few radical idiots place fear into them with dramatized false information. Several millions were lost because of these non progressive jerks
Few people on this site are truly idiots…your one.
Anony : you need to do your homework BEFORE you make such stupid comments. Tells me your about 9 years old.
9 yr old? wrong again. That would cover the intel of most of your commenters. Or is that your age??
Anon – us so called radicals do what we want where we want! We don’t bus our own tables either!!
One way or another some crooks are trying to steal taxpayer money – paying off the lawsuit would probably save us money from future expenditures for the pork barrel project – take your lumps -chumps.
This is what happens when City Government plays Monopoly with our tax dollars!
Let me repost my May 5th, 2017 comment: “Hey out there!! Hello!! Is anybody paying attention? I feel a BIG LAWSUIT coming on!! Don’t you remember that a few months ago the City Council kicked Developer Philip Chodur’s G8 hotel proposal out the door, because he didn’t have financing for his project? Thereafter, they reopened their search for another hotel developer, and came up with Gatehouse Capital from Texas. Now as it turns out Chodur has secured financing to do his hotel, without a dime from us taxpayer. On the other side, Gatehouse Capital is demanding that we give them a $150,000 “fee” to conduct their hotel feasibility study, plus bankroll their hotel project with a 20 year, interest free, $3.5 to $4.3 million tax payer loan.” GET YOUR CHECK BOOKS OUT!
Phil Chodur is total sleaze, as proven by this shake-down lawsuit – which is standard procedure for this BS artist. This phony over-promises and under-delivers, before striking. This lowlife looks like a wannabe actor who was hired as an ‘extra’ in TITANIC, to shovel coal in the boiler room – before getting fired for trying to talk to the stars. Compared to Chodur, Professor Harold Hill seems like a cross between Mahatma Gandhi and the Rev. Billy Graham. Losers like this scumbag are why the real-life versions of Tony Soprano don’t lack for clients.
The city is also financially responsible for all the property that Chodur was buying on contract in the downtown area. You haven’t seen the bill on that one yet as they are hiding it.
Hey Todd, strong words! Watch out Phil doesn’t hit you with a libel lawsuit!!
I appreciate the warnings, Mr. Foster – thanks! But don’t worry about me. What I posted about Chodur is my opinion, and that of no small number of others, from Iowa all the way to California. I know far more about Mr. Chodur than he could ever imagine.
All Blodgett done was say what everybody thinks, Chowder is a sleaze. He should never of came here, I hope when he does loose this suit he gets hit to pay our citys legal bills against him.
No way Mr Choder sues Toddy boy, if he don’t already know how Blodgett does, he will find out. A lady down our street she tried to get that meth head arrested on a assault charge on count of some thugs he paid to kick her boy’s butt when the kid stiffed him on $50 he got Todd to borrow him. MCPD and our republitard sherriff, they didnt do nothing. No lawyers would take it, they all say nothing doing. I hate Choder, do not like Blodgett or his politics but maybe would be a good thing if Choder does, he won’t come out good or in one piece.
In reply to Brian: I have never been addicted to crystal meth. Whoever claims this is wrong. The person you referenced actually borrowed $150, not $50, and I was the only person who even showed faith enough in him to willingly lend him what he told me was “rent money”. The dude lied, and then refused to repay me.
This was a recovering addict I tried to help – and look at the thanks I got.
So he paid in another way. Actions have consequences. He also left town shortly thereafter, and hasn’t returned. If he does, he’ll be given another opportunity to pay – one way, or another.
You’re a real peach Mr Blodgett, I mean, Toddy boy. Nothing quite like a good ole vigilante that resorts to violence at the drop of a hat to settle things. Especially one who never had to work a day in his life and at any given time is on a first name basis with 1/3 of the losers locked up in our county jail.
You, sir, belong in prison.
In reply to Frank: Your snobbery is unbecoming, and even downright mean. Why do you look down on society’s unfortunates, who occasionally reside in gated communities like the one you described?
One could hope that were you to open your eyes, you’d not be so high-brow. Clearly, you could benefit from such enlightenment.
Maybe it’s time you met some of those whom you denigrate as “losers” … the more I think about it, yeah – that could be quite an experience for you.
I think it is probably safe to say Frank is done blogging on here. Todd, don’t ever change! We like you just like you are. You speak your mind, we think it is wonderful. We loved your articles in the Globb, so sorry they kicked your column off. That was so stupid of Maybury. Keep blogging, Mr Blodgett, you are our entertainment, and we love seeing how you handle these nasties.
@ Sonya, the neo-nazi, drug-addicted vigilante you so admire has a habit of running people out of town when they get on his bad side. If you think this is acceptable, you are a clown. Mr. Blodgett also pulls guns on those he doesn’t want around, as he did a couple of years ago at a bar in Mason City.
It would behoove you to take note that Toddy boy claimed he was robbed by a student who was working his way through college. His claim was never proven. But that didn’t stop north Iowa’s entitled fascist from scaring the daylights out of a young, helpless Carnival employee whose only mistake was to be drinking at the same bar where this armed, trigger-happy Republitard also was, you idiot.
In reply to Lizzy: I haven’t used any illegal drugs for over 11 years, and I’m not a neo-Nazi, and never was. I was actually robbed by two carnival workers, neither of whom was in college. Based on their written statements they submitted upon being arrested, it’s doubtful that either of them completed the third grade.
I’ve never pulled guns on anyone who didn’t have it coming. As the saying goes: “When seconds count, the cops are there in minutes.”
Let me know if you’d ever like to go target shooting, or hunting; you can be my guest! (Maybe you’ll learn a new way of ‘Taking Out the Trash’). Cheers.
Hey Todd, Your patience is amazing. Some of these guys want to relitigate the fact, fiction and urban legend of your past. You really dont owe anyone a thing but your intention to set the record straight is decent and honorable. Back to the point, thanks for weighing in on the G8 saga. Hope you drop in again.
I have never agreed with Todd Blodgett on just about anything & everything from his political point of view.
I have engaged him many times in the GG about his absurd political views and ridiculous diatribes.
With that said, I have also found him to be a man of personal integrity & one that owns up to his past mistakes and failures, and that I can respect.
Who here would care to have their life laid out bare for all the world to see like Todd does? He has bigger cojones than most when comes to putting himself out there.You may not agree with him and he is sorely misguided politically, but he is honest & forthright. And he is spot in about Chodur.
Thank you, ‘Reality Check’ – I appreciate it.
Thanks, ‘Anon’! Great to hear from you. Best, T B
The City Council gave Chodur ample time, in years, to get this project approved and completed. In fact they spent over $500,000 to be shovel ready when he received the financing and now they get this type of slap in the face! Seems he did this in California and this is just another chapter to his resume.
I really like how all these people get on here and rip on the leadership of their own city. It seems to me that all of you can’t comprehend what type of image your comments and actions leaves with any potential outside economic opportunity. Keep it up and all you will ever have is regrets and envy of other cities. You all are a real classless group stabbing yourself in the back with each derogatory post of the people you chose to govern the city.
What “leadership of their own city” do you refer to? We have about three council members that are respectable. If you got any doubt about the other two obvious choices still left up there – and the mayor – then you are a clueless, anonymous fool. These three boat anchors should have quit a long time ago. As for Robin Anderson, I do not see her as a legitimate “leader”. She barged into city hall and was given the “golden key” by Eric and his stooges on the council. She has no right to anything she has been given – the special treatment she is afforded. We have a corrupt city hall. Pay attention and you might figure that out.
Well, Matt the people of mason city voted them in. And if you are to stupid to figure that out I’ll elaborate for you. For those citizens that voted it is real easy to figure by tallying the votes. And for those citizens that didn’t vote, they were saying whoever gets elected is fine with me, or basically conceding their votes to others to choose for them. So you can’t play the 20-20 hindsight game here. Please provide solid evidence to your reference on Robin Anderson. And not just rumor, hearsay and assumptions which you rely on often
I’m well aware of the shortcomings of the voting populace in this community. Anyway, somewhere in your comment there is a question; hard to tell what it is with your rambling nonsense, but I’ll give it a shot. You want proof Robin Anderson is given special treatment in good ole River City, it seems. How about the time she committed an assault and was not charged with a crime by our police? How about the time she bulldozed a flower garden in Central Park to make room for the world’s ugliest set of dice, with no permission from the park board? What about all the free labor the city provides to her sculpture show every year? These are all truths and facts, luxuries virtually no other citizen can get. Let’s not forget the $1.5 million she got from the state to build her Crime Center in the downtown. By the way, you gonna take this beating anonymously or come out of the woods with a name?
It appears that you are just injecting your own personal opinion of her. If no charges were filed in either the “claimed assault” or the accusation of acting against the “park board”, you claims are not factual. Further if the money was obtained from the state legally and thru the appropriate channels, why is that any different than you receiving money from the city thru the programs they offer for community betterment? And the funny part of this all is that the events you mentioned as proof is only confirmed by articles written by yourself in your own publication. I guess the negative comments the general public says about you when your name is discussed must be true.
P.S. you call that a beating? and a name? general public will suffice
It’s OK Brad, you can stay anonymous.
Marquardt is just frustrated.
You see Robin is his fantasy GILF and she will have none of it.
Even Robin has some standards.
100% agree with matt
We must all realize: Law enforcement in Cerro Gordo County plays favorites to the point they over step boundaries and turn a blind eye to real crimes. We seen it just recently with the Surfer Ballroom’s possible fraud to ticket buyers….blind eye.
Cry Baby. Bahhhhh bahhhhh.
@ Matt G your right, I do know this to. Cops in Mason and at the lake, they let the rich one’s get away with shit like if I did the same shit I go down. Look at Blodgett, pulls guns pays D boyz to kick the shit out of people, he gets in fights he runs people out of here, he never gets arrested or threw in jail.
Money talks bullshit walks, yes.
Your so right Matt G it makes me want to puke. WTF
Matt, I read the lawsuit 7 times now, and nowhere in it do I see that curse word “Bookmeyer”. Are you sure you typed this thing right?
Well, that’s a loaded question. First of all, yes, you are a moron if you ever gave Eric any money. You should be ashamed of yourself and seek counseling for what you supported and what he did due to your financial help. At the very least, pray to Jesus for forgiveness and maybe you will avoid the Lake of Fire resort in the center of the Earth.
Second, just because Eric messed up almost everything he touched since he was elected mayor doesn’t mean he’s connected to this on-going clown show. Yes, Eric and Robin are two peas in a pod who routinely sink low to get what they want and even employ physical intimidation and bullying, but still, maybe he was at the Willow getting bombed when all this went down and is completely innocent. He could use the defense “I had them pour me many, many stiff whiskeys with a mere splash of coke … they really messed me up and I had no idea what was going on. I was drunk for weeks and the council acted alone.”
…ol’ Phil doesn’t really build anything…he gets his money from suing everyone!
I wanna hear from the blowhards with the ‘young professionals’ that Robin is grooming to be the next generation of rip-off artists. Is your mentor innocent?
Pour Eric a stiff one and toast another big “L” for the cowardly “A” team.
Ole gorilla mitts finally put her hands on the wrong dude. I’ll be in court to watch this fiasco.
What did you expect?