WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) introduced the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act of 2015, legislation to reform the system for providing former U.S. presidents certain benefits and perks. Original co-sponsors of the bill include Senators Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Marco Rubio (R-FL). This is the companion bill to the House of Representatives bill, H.R. 1777, introduced by Congressmen Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and Elijah Cummings (D-MD).
Currently, legislation known as the Former Presidents Act provides former presidents with an annual pension and a series of benefits that taxpayers pick up the tab for. These perks include, but are not limited to communications, office space, staff, and travel expenses. In fiscal year 2015, former U.S. presidents cost taxpayers more than $2.4 million in travel, office space, communications, personnel, and other expenses.
The Presidential Allowance Modernization Act examines how former presidents are spending taxpayer dollars and would set the annual allowances for former presidents at $200,000. The legislation would then reduce the amount of perks available dollar-for-dollar for annual income over $400,000 generated by former presidents the previous year.
“Taxpayers should not be on the hook for subsidizing former presidents’ lives to the tune of millions of dollars,” said Senator Ernst. “Although this is a narrow item, this is an issue of restoring taxpayer trust by looking at reforms in the allowances and perks given to these former presidents who generate significant incomes after leaving office. At a time when we are more than $18 trillion in debt, it is critical that we stop talking and start cutting wasteful spending.”
“As Americans, we are grateful for the service of former presidents and have seen how many of them can go on to lead active and impactful careers once they’ve left office,” said Senator Rubio. “But taxpayers no longer need to foot the entire bill for all the endeavors presidents undertake after leaving office, which is why I support Joni Ernst’s effort to reform the benefits afforded to former presidents.”
“Last year, Presidents Clinton and Bush collected $2.2 million from taxpayers. I believe the majority of Americans would prefer to keep that money in the treasury,” said Senator Kirk.
About Presidential Perks and the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act:
- According to the Congressional Research Service, post-presidency funding dates back to 1958 when Congress created the Former Presidents Act (FPA) designed to “maintain the dignity” of former presidents and provide benefits to help cover costs associated with holding the office of the president.
- In fiscal year 2015, former U.S. presidents cost taxpayers more than $2.4 million in travel, office space, communications, personnel, and other expenses.
- The Presidential Allowance Modernization Act would:
- Set former presidents’ monetary allowance and pension at $200,000 each per year.
- Place reductions on perks if the former president earns more than $400,000 per year in income.
- Affirm that nothing in the legislation relates to the funding of the security or protection of a former president.
Lets first put things into perspective, The most powerful man in the world is whoever sits in the oval office. He gets $400,000.00 a year and some guy at Iowa State in Ames get 3.5M for playing catch and teaching kids how to shoot free throws. Maybe the senator from Iowa is looking in the wrong direction. She’s a piece of work.
@Peter-You are certainly old enough to know you do not run for public office to get rich. Come off the liberal B.S.
@Peter Children-If we paid that communist what he was worth he would owe us for the rest of his life.
Hey there sissy. Why don’t you quit being a coward as well as a sneaky troll and put your real name on here. There are several people who would like to explain it to you in person. I would be a little careful in smart mouthing Matt and telling him how to run his business. He must be very close to having that new software and with any luck we will never hear from a sneaky, coward like you again.
Hypocritical there much LVS & Maybe?
You two digress & run off on tangents all the time with your far-right wing garbage.
And what is with this “bad enough we have” crap LVS, there is only one person that owns this site and you aren’t it.
@Anonymous-Look who is shooting off their big mouth again. At least “Maybe and I” pay our subscription. You are a coward and a big mouth TROLL with no brains and eeven less guts. You can’t compete one on ione so you hade behind your Anonymous name where you don’t have to accept responsibility for anything you say. You are just a Baby Philosphussv.
If I make a statement it is usually about the article or responding to something someone else has said. When whatshisface said about the benefits for jodi I responded that his/her statement had nothing to do with the article.
…I am sure that “Joanie” fully understands that her wages and “guvmint” benefits are being picked up by us taxpayers???
What does that have to do with the article?
@Maybe-Exactly. It is bad enough we have Anonymous and Philosphussv violating the rules by posting all their insane views without someone new starting in.