NorthIowaToday.com

Founded in 2010

News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

U.S. says “no” to more land mines… except in Korea

Landmine
Land mine

WASHINGTON – The United States took a major humanitarian step forward today, announcing that it would not use land mines in warfare, except on the contentious Korean peninsula.

The U.S. State Department announced Tuesday that it will not use land mines outside of the Korean Peninsula, “where our actions are governed by the unique situation there.”

The U.S. remains, technically, in a state of war with North Korea (DPRK), even though major hostilities ceased in 1953. Hostile rhetoric, threats and actions from various DPRK leaders has kept the region on high alert for decades. The DPRK has a 2 million man army poised near the pro-west South Korea, and could invade at anytime.

This policy change announced today builds on prior commitments from the Obama administration, “including our announcement in June, in which we stated we will no longer produce or acquire anti-personnel land mines” and “underscored its commitment to the spirit and humanitarian aims of the Ottawa Convention”, the treaty that prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of anti-personnel land mines.

According to Human Rights Watch, antipersonnel landmines are weapons that cannot discriminate between a civilian or a soldier, and wind up killing and maiming civilians that step on them or pick them up long after a conflict. The 1997 Mine Ban Treaty comprehensively bans the use, production, stockpiling, and transfer of antipersonnel mines, and requires states to destroy their stockpiles and clear all mined areas as well as assist landmine survivors. A total of 162 states have joined the Mine Ban Treaty and are making progress in achieving a mine-free world. The United States has yet to sign the Mine Ban Treaty.

[poll random]

10 LEAVE A COMMENT2!
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We should drop millions of them in Syria.

That’s like Muslims saying they won’t use beheadings anymore, except on Infidels.

It’s like you telling everyone to be self sufficient from your mom’s house.

Well said, I tip my hat to you.

It’s like Buzz telling Rose that he tips his hat to him, when he really means tips his glass of vodka and water.

@Buzz-I think Philly likes you.

@ LVS…Of course he likes me. Deep down, he knows I’m right and that I’ve got him pegged for what he really is, vs. what he tries to make everyone else think he is. 😉

PS…..”a rose by any other name” has him pegged just the same as you do!!!

@Buzz-well he should like us. Without you, maybe and me he wouldn’t have anyone to discuss his ideas with. Some of which are not bad ideas, it is just his concepts that are at fault. He is obviously very well read, except he tends to read the wrong things and then believe them. As aggravating as Philly can be there are people on here that are a lot worse.

Well thanks LVS…it’s basically a free outlet for entertainment, and it’s kind of a shame that not many writers grace these pages. I’ve detected but a handful of voices on NIT: Iowa Sucks, LVS, Maybe, Buzzard Breath, Mediator, Nichole Bench, Marquardt, Allen, Just My Opinion, Laker Forever, Retired NIACC and a maybe one or two others. I personally like when a detectable personality emerges. I don’t even think I’m all that well read. I’m precocious though, and grasp concepts easily.

I’ve said this before peter I don’t dislike you and even though we do disagree on quite a few things sometimes I enjoy our little banters.

Even more news:

Copyright 2024 – Internet Marketing Pros. of Iowa, Inc.
10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x