Breakthrough Web Design - 515-897-1144 - Web sites for businesses
News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

Founded October 1, 2010


Senate women lead fight to renew domestic violence law



This news story was published on March 16, 2012.
Advertise on NIT Subscribe to NIT

By Rob Hotakainen and Sean Cockerham, McClatchy Newspapers –

WASHINGTON — After winning a fight just last week to preserve contraceptive health insurance coverage for women, Senate Democrats on Thursday battled conservative Republicans who say they don’t want to expand an 18-year-old federal law that created a national strategy to prevent domestic violence against women.

While Democrats say they’re shocked at any opposition to renewing the Violence Against Women Act, which passed in 1994 with bipartisan support, opponents are trying to block the legislation because they fear it would broaden American Indian tribal rights and has too many protections for gay and illegal immigrant victims of violence.

On Thursday, many of the chamber’s female members pushed back, lining up to speak on the Senate floor in favor of the reauthorization and to confront its Republican opponents.

Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington state, who led the effort to preserve contraceptive coverage, expressed disappointment that, she said, women again are trying to defend gains won over the last 50 years.

“Every single minute, 24 people across America are victims of violence by an intimate partner — more than 12 million every year. Forty-five percent of the women killed in this country die at the hands of their partner. … This one shouldn’t be about politics,” Murray said.

A bill to renew the law, introduced by Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy and co-sponsored by Idaho Republican Sen. Mike Crapo, passed the Senate Judiciary Committee last month on a 10-8 vote, without a single Republican voting in favor.

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said she was “stunned” by the panel’s vote.

“Never before had there been any controversy in all of more than a decade and a half, in all of this time, about this bill,” she said.

Republicans are split over the issue, with Crapo and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski among those siding with Democrats. So far, 58 senators have signed on to support the bill.

The bill’s opponents include Republican Sens. Orrin Hatch of Utah and Charles Grassley of Iowa. They question new provisions that include a ban on agencies that receive federal money discriminating against people based on sexual orientation. Grassley said he had seen no evidence of discrimination by organizations that received money through the program.

“The substitute creates so many new programs for underserved populations that it risks losing the focus of helping victims,” he said during a hearing on the bill. “If every group is a priority, then of course no group is a priority.”

While Leahy’s aides wrote the language, Crapo said he didn’t object to forbidding discrimination against gays and lesbians.

“I don’t have a problem with that. There are people who have objections to it, but I don’t think that would stop the bill,” Crapo said in an interview this week.

Another provision that Grassley and others questioned would allow tribes to prosecute non-Indians if they committed domestic violence or sexual assault crimes on reservations against Indians.

The National Congress of American Indians has launched a push to get senators to support the measure, saying Indian women are assaulted at twice the rate of the country as a whole and the offenders are often non-Indian males.

Leahy called it an epidemic of violence against Indian women.

Opponents say that granting that kind of tribal jurisdiction is unprecedented. They point to a 1978 Supreme Court ruling that tribes lack the inherent authority to arrest and prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes on reservations.

The latest flap comes on the heels of last week’s Senate vote rejecting a plan that would have allowed employers to opt out of the Obama administration’s contraception-coverage mandate if they objected on moral or religious grounds.

The vote helped Democrats raise millions of dollars for their congressional candidates. Democrats also were quick to pounce on the latest controversy. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the fundraising arm for Senate candidates headed by Murray, sent out an e-mail Thursday asking for donations of $5 or more for its “protect women’s rights fund.”

“Today we’re seeing another stunning GOP attack on women’s rights. … These attacks never seem to end, and it’s jaw-dropping,” Guy Cecil, the DSCC’s executive director, said in the email.

Need help with your website?
Call your local professional,
Breakthrough Web Design:
515-897-1144
or go to
BreakthoughWebDesign.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 characters available