By Ralph Vartabedian, Tom Hamburger and Matea Gold, Tribune Washington Bureau –
LOS ANGELES — Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s tax returns reveal a sophisticated low-tax investment strategy that includes offshore funds and a now-shuttered Swiss bank account, contributing to a fortune that has emerged as a potential liability in his quest for the White House.
Romney and his wife, Ann, reported more than $40 million in income in the past two years, partly from their investments in foreign jurisdictions long considered tax havens, including the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Ireland. Campaign officials say that Romney gained no tax advantage from those overseas investments.
The former Massachusetts governor released his tax returns Tuesday for the first time only after pressure from rival Newt Gingrich, who has sought to portray Romney — who ranks among the top fraction of 1 percent of richest Americans — as out of step with GOP primary voters.
Romney’s campaign carefully controlled the release, first giving the returns to a select group of news outlets Monday evening before distributing them widely Tuesday, a day that also saw President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address and the Oscar nominations.
Still, that did not appear to blunt scrutiny of his finances. Democrats pounced on details such as the Swiss bank account to further their portrayal of Romney as a high-flying financier.
The documents underscored how Romney, the wealthiest candidate to seek the presidency in recent history, has benefited from a tax code that lets investors pay taxes at a much lower rate than people who earn wages or salaries.
In all, the Romneys paid $3 million in federal taxes in 2010 on nearly $21.7 million of income derived mostly from capital gains and dividends. That is an effective tax rate of 13.9 percent, far lower than the top 35 percent marginal tax rate on wages and salaries.
The Romneys expect to pay $3.2 million on $20.9 million of income for the 2011 tax year, for an effective tax rate of 15.4 percent.
Their money is mostly held in blind trusts that Romney set up in 2003 for himself, his wife, Ann, and their adult children after he was elected governor of Massachusetts. Brad Malt, who controls the three trusts and oversees the investments, said Tuesday he is barred by law from communicating with the Romneys about the individual investments.
But University of Southern California tax professor Edward Kleinbard, a former chief of staff of the joint tax committee in Congress, said Romney still has the right to outline investment strategies and goals to his trustee.
“He could say, ‘I want the investments in the U.S,’ ” Kleinbard said.
While offshore investments may raise eyebrows among the tax-paying public, accounting experts who reviewed the Romneys’ returns said the number of these overseas accounts seemed typical for an investor of Romney’s wealth and sophistication.
“It’s a global economy now,” said Michelle Hanlon, associate professor of accounting at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies offshore investments. “As long as the income is reported to the IRS, there is nothing wrong with having an offshore account.”
“It’s hard for most people to understand what it would be like to manage that much wealth,” Hanlon added.
Malt said he set up the Swiss bank account in 2003 in Ann Romney’s trust “for diversification.” He said the account at UBS, which is headquartered in Zurich and Basel, contained $3 million before he closed it as Romney was launching his presidential campaign in 2010, and that Romney paid U.S. taxes on the $1,700 he received in interest that year.
“It was a bank account, nothing more and nothing less,” the trustee said. He said he closed it because “it just wasn’t worth it.”
It is impossible to tell how much of Romney’s fortune, which his campaign estimates at between $190 million and $250 million, comes from his holdings in offshore funds and institutions. The Romneys’ joint 2010 return includes 32 pages of detail on 17 separate “passive foreign” investments made by the couple.
The return also lists gross foreign income of $2.7 million from all sources, the most comprehensive measure of how much they pulled in from international investments, said Philip Holthouse, managing partner in the Los Angeles accounting and investment advisory firm Holthouse Carlin & Van Trigt.
Campaign officials said Romney’s overseas investment strategy is legal and fully disclosed, and independent tax experts who reviewed the returns Tuesday said they found no evidence to the contrary. Campaign officials argued that he reports all the income and pays the same U.S. taxes if the funds were based in the U.S.
“There is a suggestion that there is some tax-haven aspect to these invesments that results in a reduction of taxes,” Malt said. That is “flatly wrong,” he added.
The campaign did not say why Romney’s trusts hold overseas investments, but outside tax accountants said individuals often seek such vehicles for the returns they offer and to diversify their risk.