Founded on Oct. 1, 2010

News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

News Archives

Council OK’s $24.5 million in General Obligation bonds for Renaissance Project; Max Weaver says citizens were lied to (video)

Facebook
Tumblr
Threads
X
LinkedIn
Email
Max Weaver speaks Feb. 20, 2018

MASON CITY – The Mason City council on Tuesday night gave final approval to sell $25,400,000 in General Obligation bonds and the city named a new source to help pay off the burden – a debt service levy on the backs of city property owners.

Debt service levies are taxes assessed on property owners to pay off bonds. For much of last year and through the fall  elections, the citizens of Mason City were told by the aggressive, well-funded, sometimes-vicious “YES” campaign that the hallowed Renaissance Project would not be a burden on taxpayers.  They repeatedly promised Mason City citizens that sources such as state grants, TIF revenues, local option sales tax, and developer repayment fees would cover the cost to repay bonds sold by the city to raise funds to build the downtown project, which consists of a hotel, arena, pavilion, skywalk, museum and convention center.

John Lee was absent from
the regular council meeting, but
magically appeared on the phone
for the closed session immediately afterward.
What kind of games are being played here?

However, as former Councilman Max Weaver pointed out Tuesday night, citizens were potentially misled or outright lied to about the potential pitfalls in the project. City documents and the council meeting packet itself now list a future debt service levy as a funding source to pay off the $24.5 million in General Obligation bonds the city intends to sell. Tuesday night at the regular city council meeting, John Lee (completely absent) and Tom Thoma (on the phone) were not in their seats, but a quorum was present. The agenda item authorizing the sale of about $30 million in General Obligation bonds for the Renaissance Project and other projects passed 5-0 with little discussion.

At the meeting, only one citizen spoke to the council with concerns about this massive spending spree backed up by taxpayers.  Former councilman Max Weaver rattled off some of the “YES” campaign members who allegedly helped spread falsehoods that taxpayers would not be on the hook to payoff the Renaissance Project.  He named Robin Anderson the “pied piper” who led the charge.  In his remarks and later in conversations, he also pointed to underwear runner and wine-drinker Lonnie Dirksen, smug banker John Prebeck, “wives” of city councilmen who relentlessly argued in favor of the project, fake news professor John Skipper of the Globe Gazette, Ventura’s Darlena Barz of KGLO radio and her employee Robert Fisher, also of KGLO, where much of the “YES” campaign was masterminded, social media campaigns, websites, illegally placed signage and more that combined together orchestrated the myth of no burden to taxpayers.  He alleged the “YES” crew “rigged” last fall’s elections, as well, to ensure the council was stocked with persons who would not ask questions or challenge the project.

“It’s like we were brainwashed,” Mr. Weaver said.

Southbridge Mall needs upgrades

Mr. Weaver also said the Music Man Museum is a bad idea and not many people will care enough to go; he offered that a law enforcement / police museum would be a better idea.  He says Southbridge Mall needs serious upgrades and fixes to accommodate the arena and pavilion and questioned whether mall owner Michael Kohan would invest in the structure.  He pointed to Kohan’s dubious track record with his other properties.

The council, immediately after the regular council meeting, went into closed session to discuss the status of 5 candidates for the city’s vacant City Administrator position. In that meeting, John Lee joined the council via phone – he was absent for the regular meeting. Sources tell NIT he pushed for consideration of a certain person for the job who may or may not have been on the list of 5 candidates brought forth by consultants.

The city council packet shows that a debt service levy will be imposed in the future to retire the bonds.
YES campaign mailer in city water bill mailings.

Facebook
Tumblr
Threads
X
LinkedIn
Email
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

52 LEAVE A COMMENT2!

NIT once again exposes the truth – we were all lied to, bigly, by these knuckledraggers. Would someone please call the Attorney General’s office on Monday and get this thing stopped!

Politicans and shysters sure can twist the truth/fact – Must have learned that from liberal democats like the ones that own the Main stream media cnn/abc/cbs/mcbs – Bill Mayer like sleazeballs.

TIF – this TIF grant etc Money).what ever came out of the general fund used to pay city expenses – The money was put there buy property owners so how can you say city taxpayers are not funding TIF – Oh yea after 10 years the city will start collecting property taxes from these property owners –IF they are still here – plus the skating rink and overhead walk will generate no future taxes as they are public property. But you will probably will tax them anyway and divide the cost to each tax payer. Good old game if your the owner or an official we would say.

TIF is part of your property taxes – anyone saying different is a liberal liar.and probably on the take $$$$

You had the vote numnuts but it corruptly said NO G O bonds with a tax levy attached would be issued – Therefore nummy that agreement is void due to corruption and lies as any Conservative judge would read and prosecute such perpiTRATIORS OF THE FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT.

step away from crayon box. Roflmao

DISGUSTED
Reply Report comment

February 23, 2018 at 9:26 pm

Our house is going up for sale and we are getting out of Mason City.

I am tired of paying for this kind of BS. I am not going to reveal who I am but I suppose if you watch the houses sold in the future you may be able to figure out who I am. I am betting there are going to be more like me that are just plain tired of being scammed

Iowa code (law) 384.26 – cities with populations of 5000 to 70000 cannot issue general obligation bonds in excess of $700,000.00 without a public vote.

Easy read – if tax levy is issued then contract was broken and such parties responsible for this fraud are open to criminal prosecution.

Vain. lol

Do like the corrupt demorats did – get a FISA warrAnt and clean house on the corrupt politicians and the people who paid them – FOLLOW THE MONEY !

Clear lawful statement – NO ! G O bonds repayable with debt service property tax levy WILL be sold – Now they say their will be a tax levy issued for these bonds issued ? EASY ONE – they just broke the contract so get a judge to nullify the contract as it was breached – falsified – corrupt. Sue them to stop this bullshit.

Once again Matthew gives voice to his mistress Robin A. She lives on forever occupying rent free space in Matts head

If the details of this article are true,
“the city named a new source to help pay off the burden – a debt service levy on the backs of city property owners”
then yes, it appears we have been lied to.

I told you folks. They can never be trusted. The school board is the same way.

There is a Music Man Museum in Music Man Square, but no one goes in it.

What would Loni say” Well once my hubby gets that job as the county auditor I wont give a hoot. “Bring on the wine and craft beer folks”. Let’s parteeeeeeeeey.

Is the author of this article purposely trying to be misleading or is the author a dullard? From day 1, the funding source was always a general obligation bond. Weaver himself created the petition to mandate a vote on said general obligation bond.

The general obligation bond will not be repaid by Mason City property tax payers. The GO bond is repaid by state grants, TIF financing, and developer fees.

Did anyone really doubt that it wouldn’t eventually come to this? Ha, these are the people, the few voters chose, to run our town. Gloom, doom and despair.

can we just scrap it all already? Everyone knows its going to fall on the back of the taxpayer, it always does.
Youth hockey has ZERO chance of raising 2.000.000 as well

52
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x