By Richard Simon and Tina Susman, Los Angeles Times –
WASHINGTON — Citing the more than 6,000 rounds of ammunition bought online by the Aurora, Colo., mass shooting suspect, gun control advocates on Monday started a drive to ban anonymous bullet purchases over the Internet.
“It’s one thing to buy a pair of shoes online, but it should take more than a click of the mouse to amass thousands of rounds of ammunition,” said Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-N.J., joined by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., at a New York City news conference to announce plans to introduce the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.
The measure would require ammunition sellers to be licensed, maintain records of sales and report the sale of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition. Buyers would be required to present photo IDs, a requirement that the bill’s sponsors say would effectively ban the online or mail-order purchase of ammunition by civilians.
Gun control legislation faces a battle in Congress, where Republicans have pushed to expand gun rights and many Democratic have been skittish about the issue as their party courts votes in rural states.
A new poll released Monday found no significant change in public views on gun control and gun rights following the Colorado shooting.
According to the survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, 47 percent of respondents said it was more important to control gun ownership, while 46 percent said it was more important to protect gun rights.
Currently, there is no requirement for those who purchase ammunition, even in large amounts, to undergo background checks or present identification, said Ben Van Houten, managing attorney at the San Francisco-based Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Sellers are not required to keep records of ammunition sales.
The calls for new controls of ammo sales came as James E. Holmes was formally charged with 142 criminal counts, including 24 of first-degree murder, in connection with the July 20 movie theater shooting that left 12 people dead and 58 wounded.
The suspected gunman purchased his firearms legally at local gun stores and ordered more than 6,000 rounds of ammunition online, police said.
A 1968 federal law required ammunition dealers to be licensed and prohibited interstate mail-order sales of ammunition, but the requirements were dropped when Congress enacted the Firearm Owners Protection Act in 1986, Van Houten said.
At a news conference on the steps of City Hall in Manhattan, Lautenberg and McCarthy insisted their proposed legislation would not infringe upon Second Amendment rights, but would make it easier for dealers to spot potential criminals by bringing buyers into the open.
“Warning signs are not detectable online,” said Lautenberg, citing the suspected Colorado gunman’s ability to anonymously purchase thousands of rounds of ammunition on the Internet. “He didn’t have to interact with another human being. … You don’t have to be a scientist to see how wrong this is.”
He and McCarthy, flanked by victims of gun violence and relatives of shooting victims, challenged other politicians and regular citizens to stand up to the National Rifle Association, which McCarthy portrayed as a bullying group protecting gun makers.
“Their job is to intimidate legislators and members of Congress,” said McCarthy, whose husband, Dennis, was killed and son Kevin severely wounded in 1993 when a gunman went on a rampage on a Long Island commuter train and killed six people.
“Our voices cannot be heard unless the average citizen … says enough is enough,” she said.
An NRA spokesman declined comment, saying he wanted to first review the legislation.
This is simply another attempt at gun control.
They say this will not affect hunters or sport shooters. I wonder how they figure that?
My father was a trap shooter an wen’t through 5000 to 7000 rounds of ammunition each year in that sport. He often bought thousands of rounds at a time because he got a better price.
How about the target shooters? They also go through many thousands of rounds each year practicing for competition. Many order there ammuniton online because of the volume they use and that it is more of a specialty item.
So, this will indeed affect many people. We do not need more laws. They can’t or don’t enforce the ones already on the books. Until such time as they can do that they need to leave well enough alone.
The Colorado shooter was seeing a pshyciatrist, he had mailed an envelope with drawings showing him killing people. I’d say that is where this tragedy could have been stopped. The doctor should have made authorities aware of this persons problems. Doctor patient privliges be damned.
How about this for trapshooters? Go to a local gunshop (remember shopping local is patriotic), tell them you need 5,000 rounds of ammunition for your trapshooting, ask what kind of deal you can get, and if you are satisfied with the price, you buy it. Show your license, fill out the paperwork, and it is a done deal. By the way, if you can’t find a gun dealer who wants your business, then you aren’t looking very hard.
This sounds very reasonable to me. Some sort of controls are needed.
Controls for ammo are not needed, it’s just sugar topping and would accomplish nothing. Now this doctor patient thing is another story. If the doctor sees that his patient is a danger to the public it should be his duty to notify the police not just keep it a secret.
Yeah and when you want a 12 pack of beer, you could go to the sheriffs office to pick that up too.
This is just another ploy by a few democrats and probably Obama to get rid of guns.
Ok what is your idea to fix the problem then,instead of the stupid response you gave.Let hear it.
>implying there is a problem to begin with.
If you order large amount of ammo online,And this is just an idea maybe the ammo has to be shipped to your local sheriff office for your pickup.You show id, if legal, no felonies,no domestic violence covictions your good to go.Not against just responsible people own them. SJS