MASON CITY – A Mason City man – and convicted felon – has pled guilty to felony criminal mischief, but appealed the sentence.
Alberto Ramon, age 45 Mason City, pled guilty on June 4th to Criminal Mischief in the second degree, a class D felony. Ramon was placed on three years probation and given a five year suspended prison sentence. He was assessed $2,321.00 in court costs and fines.
However, Ramon has appealed the sentence. He posted a $5,000 security bond through Seneca Insurance Company and was released from jail.
Meanwhile, Ramon is awaiting a court date on Monday, June 30th on a serious domestic abuse charge brought by Mason City police.
Ramon, a convicted felon, is no stranger to being arrested by local police. In January of this year, he avoided police during a slow pursuit before pulling over. He was found to be in possession of drugs and charged. He pled guilty in March to drug possession and received a fine and 14 days in jail. He owes the entire $925.93 to Iowa courts in that case.
In April of 2013, Ramon was nabbed by police with marijuana and a stun gun. Judge Annette Boehlje, however, dismissed both of those charges.
SUBJECT IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY
[poll random]
Iowa retards. The rest of world stopped talking about spelling errors decades ago. Iowa continues to do so. Iowa is so backwards, so behind the rest of the country.
A captious individual who cannot resist the urge to correct a spelling and/or grammar mistake even in informal settings. After pointing out the linguistic shortcomings in others, a Grammar Nazi feels a strange sense of twisted and nonconstructive intelligentsia delight.
In reality, they are making someone else feel bad for no reason and unintentionally implying that their “superior” grammar skills are all they have to show for a wasted liberal arts education.
While proper grammar…
While proper grammar usage is all well and good, a Grammar Nazi cavils even insignificant errors in English to somehow win an argument. Of course, rather than being genuinely persuasive in an argument, pointing out English errors is a weak attack only on the typist’s credibility and never has any bearing on the underlying premises and assertions therein.
In other words, this is simply a disguised ad hominem argument which intelligent and logical people disregard.
Still, one should…
Still, one should strive to spell and use words properly, but arrogant and unsolicited advice is not a very persuasive way to teach English.
Years ago, well decades ago I noticed how spelling arseholes were despised on the internet. I never see this anywhere today except here at NIT. It speaks to the quality of people in North Iowa. They have nothing to say except to point out typo’s.
Plural for typo is typos, not typo’s.
🙂
Pleas deals often have the option to appeal. NIT dos not understand legal sentencing.
You don’t understand how to spell “does”.
It’s called a typo and nobody likes a typo Nazi. Do you have anything relevant to say about the topic?
Do you have anything relevant to say about your lack of education? Make sure you salt my fries nicely next time I come through the drive-thru, and you better smile nicely.
Now that is some pretty funny shit. LOL,…A lawyer that can’t even spell “does”. Now,…”I don’t understand”.