NorthIowaToday.com

Founded in 2010

News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

UN report: Human cause of global warming is near certainty

By absorbing much of the added heat trapped by atmospheric greenhouse gases, the oceans are delaying some of the impacts of climate change. Photo: WMO/Olga Khoroshunova
By absorbing much of the added heat trapped by atmospheric greenhouse gases, the oceans are delaying some of the impacts of climate change. Photo: WMO/Olga Khoroshunova

NEW YORK – Global warming is unequivocal, human influence has been the dominant cause since the mid-20th century, and atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, already at levels not seen in at least 800,000 years, will persist for many centuries, the final version of the latest United Nations report on climate change warned Thursday.

“Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and changes in all components of the climate system,” according to the report, which finalizes a summary of findings by the UN-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued in September, outlining a litany of threats from the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to rising oceans to extreme weather events such as cyclones and heat waves.

“Limiting climate change will require substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions,” it stresses, using the term “extremely likely” for human causality since the mid-20th century, meaning there is a 95 to 100 per cent probability that humankind, and not naturally occurring phenomena, are to blame, a 5 percent increase from the 90 to 100 per cent “very likely” probability of if the IPCC’s last report in 2007.

Even if emissions of global warming carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are stopped, most aspects of climate change will persist for many centuries. “This represents a substantial multi-century climate change commitment created by past, present and future emissions of CO2,” the report warns.

“Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes,” it says.

“This evidence for human influence has grown since AR4 (the last IPCC report). It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.”

The report says it is extremely likely that more than half the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the increase in greenhouse gas caused by humans and other human causes. Some of the major warming emissions caused by humankind since the birth of the industrial era 250 years ago – CO2, methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) – have all increased since 1750 due to human activity.

“Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes. This evidence for human influence has grown since AR4. It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century,” the report stresses.

“Concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O now substantially exceed the highest concentrations recorded in ice cores during the past 800,000 years. The mean rates of increase in atmospheric concentrations over the past century are, with very high confidence, unprecedented in the last 22,000 years.”

It notes that each of the last three decades has been successively warmer at the Earth’s surface than any preceding decade since 1850, changes in many extreme weather and climate events have been observed since about 1950, the frequency of heat waves has likely increased in large parts of Europe, Asia and Australia.

There are also likely more land regions where the number of heavy precipitation events has increased than where it has decreased and the frequency or intensity of heavy precipitation has likely increased in North America and Europe. Likely means a 66 to 100 per cent probability.

On the cryosphere (cold regions) the report notes that annual mean Arctic sea ice decreased over the period 1979 to 2012 at a rate very likely in the range 3.5 to 4.1 per cent per decade and in the range 9.4 to 13.6 per cent per decade the summer sea ice minimum (perennial sea ice).

There is very high confidence that the extent of Northern Hemisphere snow cover has decreased since the mid-20th century, decreasing by an average 1.6 per cent per decade for March and April, and 11.7 per cent per decade for June, over the 1967 to 2012 period.

There is also high confidence that permafrost temperatures have increased in most regions since the early 1980s. Observed warming was up to 3° Celsius in parts of Northern Alaska and up to 2°C in parts of the Russian European North, where a considerable reduction in permafrost thickness and areal extent has been observed over the period 1975 to 2005.

As for the sea level, the rise since the mid-19th century has been larger than the mean rate during the previous two millennia, its global mean level rising 0.19 metres over the period 1901 to 2010.

Global surface temperature change for the end of the 21st century is likely to exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850 to 1900 for most scenarios studied by IPCC, and likely or “more likely than not” to exceed 2°C for some of them. Warming will continue beyond 2100 under all scenarios except one, will continue to show inter-annual-to-decadal variability and will not be regionally uniform.

It is very likely that Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st century as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease, the report adds.

Global mean sea level, meanwhile, will continue to rise during the 21st century, very likely exceeding the rate observed during 1971 to 2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass from glaciers and ice sheets.

41 LEAVE A COMMENT2!
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

OMG

Am I to believe that there are people who actually BELIEVE the United Nations and anything it says?

Wake up folks.

For the sake of argument, I don’t believe there is anything we can do to change the fate of our climate, one way or another.

I do believe we can do something about “Political Warming” though. Yes, we should all be good stewards of the earth and do our best to take care of it.

RE: Global Warming

We need legislation that PROHIBITS anyone from making a PROFIT on ANY PLAN that serves to protect our planet.

Do that: I am betting the Global Warming argument will disappear.

Just Saying.

Global warming deniers keep parroting FOX news and Rush Limbaugh. You could tell them it’s raining outside and if FOX tells them it’s not, well, it’s not raining outside.

Total ignoramuses who can’t even begin to understand science. Arguing with LVS and maybe is like running in the special Olympics. Even if you win, you’re still retarded! LOL

I don’t watch fox. I do hours of research before I believe something unlike you who believes everything your puppetmaster tells you to believe. That makes me more aware of whats going on and you brain dead.

@maybe-we must be right if a dweeb like SUCKS disagrees. What does a mentally deranged person who lives in their parents basement know about anything. Oh yea, that is the great liar Philly too.

I’m curious where you did hours of research that contradict the article under which we are both commenting. What led you to your conclusions on Global Warming?

It is true that you can find anything online to back up your position, I look for magazine or news articles from reputable sites. Not just 1 or 2 but at least a dozen or so. It was a couple years ago that I did the research and I lost that computer so I would have to start over looking for the sites that I got my info from but it was all online and a couple shows on the history channel that started it all.

OK, so site a source who told you global warming is a hoax and not real and I’ll bet it leads right back to rightwing nut kookery! LOL

The History Channel isn’t well known for their fact checking. However, scientists typically are. Perhaps you really should take some time to look into the issue again.
Putting that aside, I’m curious what harm you think we are doing by attempting to fight global warming even if we aren’t the cause of it? Wouldn’t new technologies be a boon for our economy? Isn’t it our duty in our society to leave things better than we found them? I really don’t see the harm but perhaps you do and can share.

I said the history channel started my research. After seeing a couple programs about the truth about global warming I decided to do some checking and what I found is that what the liberals is saying is wrong, global warming does happen but it is all on a cycle that repeats every 10’s of thousands of years or so.

The changes in our climate is a cycle that the planet goes through all by itself. We can spend trillions and still not be able to change that so why try, let it happen naturally.

I’m curious if you even read the article above, maybe. While it’s true that the globe does go through cycles, this one seems to be helped along. Be that as it may, it is certainly more important what the climate is now than what it was when the Vikings were sailing around, since we have billions of more people. Our coastlines and our crop growing areas are of vital importance to those billions. Why shouldn’t we invest in trying to improve the lives of everyone, even if the climate is shifting naturally? I haven’t heard any good reason not to other than some calling it a liberal plot. Since liberals aren’t typically in it for the profit in these scenarios and since we actually could use some new direction for our advancement as a society, why not go this way? I’d really appreciate a good reason why not.

You gotta be kidding me, people actually think that Al Gore is full of crap and they don’t believe global warming??? I can’t believe that. The next thing they will say is that marijuana should be illegal. Whats up with that?

@Buzz-even most of the Liberals laugh at Gore now.

As far as I’m concerned, Gore was nothing but a slug when he was VP. And now he’s an even bigger one.

I think the burners missed the sarcasm, I will try harder the next time.

We see no need for a snow fence on the far west side of town the Mason City street department kept telling me. I spent over $100. digging out the five feet high frozen drift that sealed the doors between my house and detached garage. That’s a lot, a-holes!!!

Need some help? Maybe some of us can pitch in and shovel you out.

I don’t understand the idea that since there have been climate changes in the past that this global warming climate change isn’t real. Am I not understanding something here?

Are those that contend that global climate change isn’t happening just joking or do they believe it? Or do they believe it’s happening but that mankind isn’t any part of the cause or solution? In other words, rather than just making statements about lies, what is the truth as you see it?

The truth as I see it, global warming is happening but it has nothing to do with man but with the planet itself. It is a cycle that the planet goes through over and over again.

So, what evidence are you using to preclude mankind from contributing? Since it’s basic science that certain things contribute more to warming, do you think we have any business trying to slow down global climate change if we have an opportunity to do so, whether we caused it or not?

Of course there is climate change. There always has been and there always will be. Global Warming is a libraterd lie.

Word.

There is proof that the climate changes every so often, like every 10 to 20,000 years or so. The climate we are going through is the same as what they went through 10,000 years ago. I like the history channel and I saw a show on the climate that stated that everything that the earth is going through happens for a reason, to keep our planet alive and this global warming happens every 20,000 years by design. Gore pushes global warming even though he knows it isn’t real. Why they want everybody to believe that global warming is real is beyond me, maybe money or to see if they can lie to us I don’t know.

@maybe-not to worry, these idiots can’t comprehend what they read and have drank the KOOL AID so much they are brain dead. There have always been tornado’s in Iowa. As a matter of fact there have been less and less in the last few years compared to what there used to be. There is more sea ice in the artic then there has been in years and if anyone thinks there is global warming just step outside. What a bunch of idiots.

@LVS “IF” global warming is a man-made problem, do you think it could be because of all that hot air that’s continually being spewed by that genius liar at the lake?

@Buzz-I hadn’t thought of that but you are probably right. It does tend to be hotter over there because of all the methane spread by that loud mouth liar. Good point.

@LVS & BUZZ — It’s probably caused by all those vicious motorcycle exhaust fumes…..this time of year. #ThereShouldBeALaw

@Polio-so very true. It’s those Harleys with the loud pipes combined with the methane.

I remember in the 60’s and 70’s, they were telling us we should worry about global cooling and the Ice age was coming back. Iowa would eventually be covered by ice as it was by a glacier that formed Clear Lake. These things come in cycles and take thousands of years to happen. This is nothing that we have to worry about. Anyone who thinks humans can change the climate is naive. This is just a way for the left wing Government to make more regulations on Business’s that cost all of us more on goods we buy. Even President Bush bought into this lye when he signed the bill to ban that light bulb.

^^^^ correction, lie, but lye works as well LOL

Let’s explore your ideas here. So, if they were wrong in the 60s and 70s, that’s why they are wrong now? Science has improved since then, hasn’t it?

On the regulations to add expenses to everyone, what would be the goal in that for those on the left? What’s the end game there? What’s the motivation?

On mankind not being able to affect climate, thinking so being naive, what makes you confident of this? Since we lived under the threat of nuclear winter in the 60s and 70s, and having seen the change in weather for a couple of years when volcanoes erupted, we actually know that we have the potential to change climate through the use of nuclear weapons on a large scale. So where is the naivete?

Thanks for your thoughtful answers.

To what gain? Money, follow the trail.

In the 70’s it was Global Cooling. Auto manufacturers started putting catalytic converters on the exhausts to convert CO to CO2. NOW CO2 is causing Global Warming? See anything wrong? When scientists show actual data of man made effects and the Govnm’t has us remove the converters from our cars . . . then I’ll believe.

Catalytic converters were pushed to reduce smog caused by the nitrogen oxides in the exhaust. Yes, it converts CO quickly, but that CO, while deadly initially, converts to CO2 naturally and so the catalytic converters are helping the environment, not causing additional Global warming.

But if I follow the money, who made money off of this notion? Can you give me some evidence that liberals are making out like bandits? Please, follow through.

I just fact checked myself and while smog was the driving force, the first ones weren’t made for the nitrogen oxides, that came a few years later. Mea culpa.

Another thing to look at are the archeological finds of mines with tools neatly stacked waiting for humans to return that are being exposed by the retreating glaciers.

Greenland wasn’t a joke by the Vikings, it actually was a “green” land once upon a time.

And there was the mass of ice in the antearctic that was “missed” when determining the decrease in the ice sheet.

But I spoose the real telling part are the words: “has likely increased”, “extremely likely”, “with very high confidence” “very likely”. They are hedging their words.

Joao do Carmo say what? How is what you just said is relevant to anything. The part of your brain that forms logic is defective it appears.

sucks you are the defective one, if a person doesn’t agree with you they are brain dead, you have no open mindness at all and I would dare say you are the one that is defective. Why don’t you just go play in traffic.

@maybe-glad to see you are back on here. It has been the Beavis and Butthead show on here all day with the two phsyco twins Philly and SUCKS. It is good to see someone with some brains post on here. The two basement buddys are fast becoming closer than friends. They deserve eachother.

buttt buddies

I stumbled upon this today and was reminded of this topic.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/greenland-used-to-be-green.htm

Turns out, not so much on the green part.

Even more news:

Copyright 2024 – Internet Marketing Pros. of Iowa, Inc.
41
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x