NorthIowaToday.com

Founded in 2010

News & Entertainment for Mason City, Clear Lake & the Entire North Iowa Region

Ex-administrators’ attorneys accuse witness of ethics violations in Sandusky case

By Jeremy Roebuck, The Philadelphia Inquirer –

PHILADELPHIA—Attorneys for two former Pennsylvania State University administrators charged in the Jerry Sandusky child-sex scandal on Friday accused a key witness of violating her professional ethics when she testified before a grand jury against their clients.

Signaling a potential defense strategy, lawyers Caroline Roberto and Thomas J. Farrell said former university general counsel Cynthia Baldwin violated attorney-client privilege when she helped prosecutors build the case against suspended Penn State athletic director Tim Curley and former university vice president Gary Schultz.

Baldwin’s lawyer, Charles De Monaco, disputed that, saying his client had an impeccable reputation and the highest integrity.

“The suggestion by anyone that Ms. Baldwin betrayed her clients and her profession or testified falsely is untrue,” he said.

Curley and Schultz were arraigned on new charges of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and child endangerment Friday at a hearing in a Dauphin County district court.

Last year, prosecutors accused the two of ignoring abuse allegations against Sandusky in 2001, and of then lying to the grand jury about what they knew.

The case against them was expanded Thursday. The men now stand charged with engaging in a conspiracy with former university president Graham B. Spanier to cover up Sandusky’s crimes. Spanier was charged in the case Thursday, as well.

Curley and Schultz have said they thought Baldwin represented them when they testified in January 2011 before a grand jury investigating allegations against Sandusky. Sandusky was ultimately charged and convicted of molesting 10 boys over 15 years.

Typically, courts consider conversations between lawyers and their clients privileged.

So, Roberto said Friday, it was a surprise to learn that Baldwin had become a key witness in prosecutors’ new case against the administrators.

In dual motions filed Friday, she and Farrell, Schultz’s lawyer, argued that their clients’ grand jury testimony should be suppressed at their trial.

“We were stunned, we were flabbergasted,” she said.

Baldwin has maintained that she never represented either administrator and sat in on the ordinarily secret proceedings on behalf of Penn State.

Curley and Schultz said little during Friday’s hearing as Judge William C. Wenner read out the new charges. Both left immediately after on $50,000 unsecured bonds.

Spanier, who has denied the allegations against him, is to be arraigned Wednesday. All three face preliminary hearings Nov. 12.

0 LEAVE A COMMENT2!
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Even more news:

Copyright 2024 – Internet Marketing Pros. of Iowa, Inc.
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x