WASHINGTON, D.C. – An alarming number of countries used the death penalty to tackle real or perceived threats to state security linked to terrorism, crime or internal instability in 2014, Amnesty International found in its annual review of the death penalty worldwide.
The number of death sentences recorded in 2014 jumped by almost 500 compared to 2013, mainly because of sharp spikes in Egypt and Nigeria, including mass sentencing in both countries in the context of internal conflict and political instability.
The USA continued to be the only country to put people to death in the region, although executions dropped from 39 in 2013 to 35 in 2014 – reflecting a steady decline in the use of the death penalty in the country over the past years. Only seven states executed in 2014 (down from nine in 2013) with four – Texas, Missouri, Florida and Oklahoma –responsible for 89 per cent of all executions. The state of Washington imposed a moratorium on executions in February. The overall number of death sentences decreased from 95 in 2013 to 77 in 2014.
But there was also good news to be found in 2014 – fewer executions were recorded compared to the year before and several countries took positive steps towards abolition of the death penalty.
Top executioners
China again carried out more executions than the rest of the world put together. Amnesty International believes thousands are executed and sentenced to death there every year, but with numbers kept a state secret the true figure is impossible to determine.
The other countries making up the world’s top five executioners in 2014 were Iran (289 officially announced and at least 454 more that were not acknowledged by the authorities), Saudi Arabia (at least 90), Iraq (at least 61) and the USA (35).
Excluding China, at least 607 executions were known to have been carried out in 2014, compared to 778 in 2013, a drop of more than 20 per cent.
Executions were recorded in 22 countries in 2014, the same number as the year before. This is a significant decrease from 20 years ago in 1995, when Amnesty International recorded executions in 42 countries, highlighting the clear global trend of states moving away from the death penalty.
“Some people take breathing for granted. And, once in a while, there are those that deserve a good killing.”
Buzz you sound like a very dangerous individual. In order to deprive someone of life there needs to be legitimate reasons…most notably indisputable proof that an individual has deprived someone else of life. If you believe the death penalty should be applied for other humans, under different circumstances, please elaborate on your views. I would like to know where you’re going with your comments. “A good killing?” Are you the arbitrator of who gets to breathe and who doesn’t?
Such wonderful company we keep. With that said, I have mixed feelings on the death penalty. When it comes to those who willfully and maliciously destroy life…I think the death penalty may be their just dessert. But it should absolutely be abolished for any other crime, or perceived crime. And when it is used, the evidence must be incontrovertible with the highest burden of proof maintained.